<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Investor in the Wilderness - Latest Comments in Shaw Wu, AmTech's Dr. Jekyll and Mr Hyde</title><link>http://zachbass.disqus.com/</link><description>Investor guidance for the rest of us</description><atom:link href="https://zachbass.disqus.com/shaw_wu_amtechs_dr_jekyll_and_mr_hyde/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sat, 17 May 2008 15:03:56 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Shaw Wu, AmTech's Dr. Jekyll and Mr Hyde</title><link>http://zachbass.blogspot.com/2008/05/shaw-wu-amtechs-dr-jekyll-and-mr-hyde.html#comment-483918</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Son of a bitch increased my cost of doing business significantly. Had to purchase some puts and sold half of my stock before earnings.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;He better hope that I never encounter him on the street.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Should have been answerable to the SEC for that stunt.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Wonder how much AmTech made on the shorts and puts on that deal-eo.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">jim</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 17 May 2008 15:03:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Shaw Wu, AmTech's Dr. Jekyll and Mr Hyde</title><link>http://zachbass.blogspot.com/2008/05/shaw-wu-amtechs-dr-jekyll-and-mr-hyde.html#comment-420592</link><description>&lt;p&gt;You know Orky, that's a GREAT IDEA! There should be some sort of official rating system on the performance, and/or accuracy of their predictions. I have access to a tool in my Fidelity account when I research stocks that gives some information on their accuracy. But it isn't comprehensive.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I enter the ticker and select the "Analysts Opinions" tab and I get a table of various analysts that they have data on. And there's an accuracy rating table.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Interestingly, Ativo Research is rated as most accurate with a 96 rating. But it is dated, as their last report was a downgrade made in January.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I'll check to see if there is such a thing. Seems someone would have thought of this before?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Zach Bass</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 10:04:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Shaw Wu, AmTech's Dr. Jekyll and Mr Hyde</title><link>http://zachbass.blogspot.com/2008/05/shaw-wu-amtechs-dr-jekyll-and-mr-hyde.html#comment-419890</link><description>&lt;p&gt;We need to set up an "analysts' analysis" and ... "analysts' rating" and make it public ... I am serious.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">orkydea</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 03:45:28 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>